Disposes of a supplementary application after the respondent rejected a representation, directing the petitioner to institute a fresh writ petition for redressal if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
ABHASH KUMAR JHA THROUGH HIS FATHER BHASKAR JHA .....Petitioner Through: Ms.Renu, Ms.Shivani Verma and Mr.Kamlesh Mishra, Advs.
versus
KENDRIYA VIDYALAYA SANGATHAN & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. S. Rajappa R Gowrishankar and Mr.G. Dhivyasri, Advs for KVS. Mr.Gaurav Sharma, SPC with Mr.Sachin Singh and Mr.Siddhartha Nagpal, Advs for R-3.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R % 18.12.2024
CM APPL. 33143/2024
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J DECEMBER 18, 2024/MJ/DP
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/12/2024 at 12:55:28
Abhash Kumar Jha
Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan
Purushaundra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
