Petitioner appeared in person and sought to withdraw the writ petition and related applications. The Court permitted the withdrawal with liberty to file appropriate proceedings, disposing of the matters while leaving rights and contentions open.
Withdrawal permitted with liberty; rights and contentions left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
LT COL NAVEEN KUMAR ANAND (RETD) ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Siddhi Gupta, Advocate for Mr. Nikhil Goel, SPP for CBI.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R % 10.01.2024
CM Appls. 31217/2018, 37456/2019 & 6873/2022
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
JANUARY 10, 2024 js
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 12:25:54
LT COL NAVEEN KUMAR ANAND (RETD)
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
Acting Chief Justice
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
