Disposed

Silverlink International v. Union of India

Delhi HC11 Jan 2024W.P.(C)/7015/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Five Writ Petitions challenging rejection for Haj 2023 registration quota. Court directed Petitioners to submit comprehensive representations and permitted them to apply for Haj 2024 subject to the final decision on those representations.

What did the court decide?

Petitioners directed to submit composite representation; permitted to apply for Haj 2024 subject to final decision on representation.

Silverlink International Vs Union of India — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~63, 64, 65, 198

¶2

* (63)	IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+	W.P.(C) 7206/2023 & CM APPLs. 28016/2023, 28017/2023, 62798/2023, 899/2024 & 900/2024 MUBARAK HAJ AND UMRA SERVICES ..... Petitioner
	versus
	UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent
(64)
+	W.P.(C) 7229/2023 & CM APPL. 28197/2023
	RIZHWAN HAJ AND UMRA SERVICES ..... Petitioner
	versus
	UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent
(65)
+	W.P.(C) 7241/2023 & CM APPLs. 28207/2023, 28208/2023, 62763/2023, 897/2024 & 898/2024 DHEEN HAJ SERVICE ..... Petitioner
	versus
(198)	UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent
+	W.P.(C) 7015/2023
	SILVERLINK INTERNATIONAL ..... Petitioner
	versus
	UNION OF INDIA ..... Respondent
	Appearances:

¶3

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:27:12

¶4

Mr. Sulaiman Mohd. Khan, Ms. Taiba Khan, Mr. Bhanu Malhotra, Md. Ainul Ansarim, Mr. Gopeshwar Singh Chandel and Mr. Abdul Bari Khan, Advocates for Petitioner in Item Nos. 63, 65, 198.

¶5

Mr. Vedansh Anand, GP for UOI in Item Nos. 65.

¶6

Mr. Apoorv Kurup, CGSC with Mr. Akhil Hasija, Advocate for R-1 in Item Nos. 54.

¶7

Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC with Mr. Kaushal Jeet Kait, GP and Mr. Aditya Singh, Under Secretary, Mr. Sumit Goel, Legal Head and Mr. Hitesh Garg, CA in Item No.63, 198.

¶8

Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC with Ms. Ira Singh, Mr. Sumit Goel, Advocates and Mr. Vedansh Anand, GP in Item Nos. 64, 65.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD

¶11

O R D E R % 11.01.2024

¶12

The Petitioners seek to challenge the communication sent by the Respondent to the Petitioners rejecting the representation made by the Petitioners herein and declaring them as ineligible for registration and allocation of Haj Quota for Haj 2023.

¶13

The primary contention in most of the Writ Petitions is that though clarifications were sought for from the Petitioners on some points for which replies have been given. The Representation of the Petitioners have been rejected on entirely different grounds. It is stated that for Haj 2024 also similar clarifications have been sought from the Petitioners and notices have been issued to the Petitioners for which replies have been given and are

¶14

¶15

being given by the Petitioners.

¶16

The Petitioners are directed to give a composite representation to the Respondents in addition to the replies already filed. The Petitioners are also directed to take all the grounds in the representation including the ground taken by them in the present Writ Petition.

¶17

Representations/further representations are directed to be given on or before 06:00 PM on 13.01.2024.

¶18

Subject to the final decision taken by the Respondents on the representations of the Petitioners, the Petitioners are permitted to apply for Haj 2024. It is made clear that in case the representations of the Petitioners are rejected, then the Petitioners shall not claim equity for consideration for Haj 2024 on the ground that the Petitioners have already filed their applications. It is also open for the Petitioners to challenge the decision taken by the Respondents by taking appropriate steps in accordance with law.

¶19

As indicated above, the Respondents are directed to not only consider the representations of the Petitioners but also the grounds taken in the present Writ Petitions while adjudicating the representations.

¶20

Let the exercise be concluded within 20 days from today.

¶21

With these directions and liberties, the Writ Petitions are disposed of along with the pending applications, if any.

¶22

SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J

¶23

JANUARY 11, 2024 Rahul

¶24

Silverlink International v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Silverlink International v. Union of India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

No 948664S Sergeant Kundan Vs Union of India and Ors.

969623L Sgt Bajinder Singh Vs Union of India and Ors.

Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors. Vs Subhas Chandra Pandey

Surender Kumar Vs MCD & Ors.

Lal Chand Ranwa & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Sandeep Singh Vs Government of NCT O Delhi & Ors.F

Mahendra Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Roop Singh Vs Government of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

The Residents Welfare Society Shyam Kunj Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Garvit Goyal and Others Vs Government of NCT and Others

Sh. Jugal Kishore & Ors. Vs Additional District Magistrate & Anr.

Kuldeep Singh Luthra Vs Registrar of Companies & Ors.

Maha Tours and Travels Vs Union of India

Al Manasik Tours International Vs Union of India