Allowed
Piyush & Ors. v. Iifl Home Finance Ltd.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/47/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition withdrawal allowed with liberty to file appeal to DRAT, subject to non-comment on merits.
What did the court decide?
Withdrawal of writ petition granted with liberty to file appeal before DRAT with condonation of delay.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~2
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 47/2024 & CM APPL. 134-135/2024 PIYUSH & ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Kameshwar Mishra, Advocate (Through video conferencing) versus IIFL HOME FINANCE LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Nishant Awana, Advocate with Ms. Rini Badoni Awana, Mr. Mayank Choudhary and Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocates.
¶4
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA O R D E R % 09.01.2024
¶5
- After some arguments, learned counsel for petitioners wishes to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file an appeal before the DRAT along with an application for condonation of delay.
¶6
- Learned counsel for respondent-Financial Institution states that the Financial Institution has already taken possession of the secured assets on 03rd January, 2024.
¶7
- Keeping in view the aforesaid, the present writ petition and applications are disposed of with the aforesaid liberty. However, this Court clarifies that it has not commented on the merits of the controversy. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.
¶8
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
¶9
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
PIYUSH & ORS.
- respondent
IIFL HOME FINANCE LTD.
Coram
AI extract
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court