Permission to withdraw a writ petition filed seeking revival of a contract was allowed with consent of parties as respondents promised consideration subject to withdrawal.
Permission to withdraw writ petition allowed; interim order vacated; next hearing cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~46
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
UNION OF INDIA MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS AND ANR
.....Respondents Through: Ms.Anubha Bhardwaj, CGSC with Mr.Vishal Sharma, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R
% 11.11.2024
C.M.No.65688/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2024 at 12:19:47
leave of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition.
MANMOHAN, CJ
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
NOVEMBER 11, 2024 KA
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/11/2024 at 12:19:47
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Galvano India Pvt Ltd
Union of India
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
