This short order records that the petitioner complied with its submission that a tax refund and interest were duly released with no remaining grievance. The High Court disposed of the writ petition as having rendered infructuous.
Disposal of the writ petition as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~30
SAI FURNITURE ART .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sushil Gaba, Adv.
versus
COMMISSIONER OFDELHI VALUE ADDED TAX AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajeev Aggarwal, ASC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R % 06.08.2024
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that a refund has been duly released along with interest and no further grievance remains.
In view of the aforesaid, the writ petition shall stand disposed of
as having rendered infructuous.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
AUGUST 06, 2024/ RW
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 09:33:58
SAI FURNITURE ART
COMMISSIONER OF DELHI VALUE ADDED TAX
Yashwant Varma
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
