A PIL petitioners' request for directions to secure citizen data with travel companies is dismissed with liberty to approach the government. The court clarified it did not comment on the merits as no prior representation was filed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~ A-159
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
O R D E R
% 03.04.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/04/2024 at 12:30:23
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
APRIL 3, 2024/ TS
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 05/04/2024 at 12:30:23
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant directions to the Union of India regarding confidentiality of personal data collected by travel companies.
Ashwin Kumar Upadhyay
Union of India
Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
