Writ petition against MCD disposed of after petitioners stated their grievance stood mitigated, with liberty reserved to re-agitate before the concerned authority if any further grievance arises.
Liberty reserved to re-agitate grievances before the concerned authority; petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
SURENDRA KUMAR DUGAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. M.F. Khan and Ms. Bibhuti Mishra, Advs.
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Arjun Mahajan, SC for MCD with Mr. Apoorv and Ms. Neha Rai, Advs. for R-1 Mr. Tushar Sannu, Adv. for GNCTD with Mr. Manovi Raj Singh, Adv. with SI Sonal Raj, P.S. Model Town. Mr. Shiv Charan Garg, Mr. Imran Khan and Ms. Jahanvi Garg, Advs. for R-5
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
AUGUST 7, 2024 p’ma
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:46:09
Surendra Kumar Dugar & Anr.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
GNCTD
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
