Smt. Ripu Daman and Anr. v. the Sub Divisional Magistrate
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/3827/2023
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Adjournment order only: petitioner no.2 was given four weeks to file a rejoinder in the writ petition, and both the application and writ petition were listed for further consideration.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~11
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 3827/2023
¶4
SMT. RIPU DAMAN AND ANR .....Petitioners
¶5
Through: Mr. Syed Urfee Haider and Mr. Talib Khan, Advs. for petitioner no.1 (through v/c) Mr. Puneet Singh Bindra and Mr. Rishabh Gupta, Advs. for petitioner no.2.
¶6
versus
¶7
THE SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE .....Respondent Through:
¶8
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA
¶9
O R D E R % 04.04.2025
¶10
CM APPL.7267/2024
¶11
- Learned counsel for the petitioner no.2 (Chander Shekhar) seeks some time to file rejoinder.
¶12
- Let the same be filed within a period of 4 weeks from today.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Smt. Ripu Daman
- petitioner
Chander Shekhar
- respondent
The Sub Divisional Magistrate
Coram
AI extract
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court