The High Court set aside an order of the Adjudicating Authority and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, noting the Directorate of Enforcement had no objection. The writ petition was disposed of with no observations on merits.
Impugned order set aside; matter remanded to Adjudicating Authority for fresh adjudication.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~71
AARTI KARNANI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abhimanyu Bhandari, Ms. Kartika Sharma and Ms. Vanshita Gupta, Advocates.
versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Mr. Anurag Jain, Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Mr. Kartik Sabharwal, Mr. Vivek Gaurav and Ms. Abhipriya Rai, Advocates for R- 2/ED.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 08.04.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2024 at 12:34:24
any. It is made clear that this Court has not made any observations on the merits of the case.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
APRIL 8, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/04/2024 at 12:34:24
AARTI KARNANI
UNION OF INDIA
ED
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
