Single judge order where the respondent appeared but petitioner was absent and had not filed amended memo of parties; writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
S.K. SRIVASTAVA ..... Petitioner
Through: None.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Sushil Raaja, SPC for UOI/R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
O R D E R % 16.01.2024 1. None appears for the petitioner. The same has been the position for the last many dates. In fact, the petitioner has not even filed the amended memo of parties in terms of the order dated 07.01.2016.
REKHA PALLI, J
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
JANUARY 16, 2024 p
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/05/2024 at 12:30:12
S.K. Srivastava
Union of India
Rekha Palli
Rajnish Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
