The High Court of Delhi disposed of a writ petition as infructuous because a speaking order deciding the petitioner's representations was already passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, implementing the impugned order.
The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous with liberty to assail the fresh order dated 10.01.2024.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
D.R. ARORA ..... Petitioner
versus
THE LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS.
..... Respondent Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Addl. Standing Counsel with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi and Ms. Manisha, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
O R D E R
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/05/2024 at 12:29:33
15.01.2024 with an advance copy thereof to the learned counsel for the respondent.
REKHA PALLI, J
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J
JANUARY 16, 2024/ib
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/05/2024 at 12:29:33
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Ram Niwas Bansal Vs. State Bank of Patiala and Anr.Referred¶13
Ram Niwas Bansal Vs. State Bank of Patiala and Anr., 1998 (4) SLR 711
D.R. Arora
The Lieutenant Governor of Delhi & Ors.
Rekha Palli
Rajnish Bhatnagar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
