Writ petition withdrawn by the petitioner seeking liberty to file afresh with the relevant party impleaded. The High Court allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn with that liberty.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition for impleading the relevant party.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~69
RAM SINGH SIKORIA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aditya, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC with Mr. Devvrat Yadav, Advocate for UOI. Mr. Vedansh Anand, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 05.09.2024 CM APPL. 51699/2024 (for withdrawal of writ petition)
W.P.(C) 3503/2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 5, 2024 nk
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/09/2024 at 15:36:16
Ram Singh Sikoria
Union of India & Anr.
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
