The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner's writ petition as a representation regarding his boarding out and to pass a reasoned order within four months.
Petition disposed by directing respondents to treat it as a representation and pass a reasoned order within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~31
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, SPC with Mr. Anuj Chaturvedi and Ms. Harshita Maheshwari, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR O R D E R
REKHA PALLI, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
AUGUST 13, 2024 /ss
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2024 at 14:30:20
2 issues framed by the court
Whether an employee boarded out due to defective vision after four years of service is entitled to sympathetic consideration by treating the petition as a representation.
Whether the respondents are directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order regarding the petition within four months.
MD. RAJAK KHAN
UNION OF INDIA
Rekha Palli
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
