Petitioner sought direction to conclude disciplinary proceedings. Court noted the matter was listed for hearing before the Disciplinary Committee, held no substantive work survived in the writ petition, and disposed of it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~63
MAHABIR SINGH YADAV ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Umesh Sharma and Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocates.
versus
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Preetpal Singh, Ms. Tanupreet Kaur, Mr. Saurabh Sharma and Ms. Sonali Sharma, Advocates for BCI. Mr. Ajay Kumar Aggarwal, Advocate. Mr. Sajan K. Singh, Advocate for R-2
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R
% 20.02.2024 CM APPL. 10371/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 2537/2024 & CM APPL. 10370/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/03/2024 at 11:34:17
writ petition is disposed of, along with pending application(s), if any.
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
FEBRUARY 20, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 01/03/2024 at 11:34:17
Mahabir Singh Yadav
Bar Council of India & Ors.
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
