The High Court of Delhi dismissed W.P.(C) 1102/2024 as having been voluntarily withdrawn by the learned counsel for the petitioner, who sought leave to file afresh later.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file afresh after removing errors.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
versus
THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND OTHERS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Divya Swamy, Standing Counsel along with Ms. Yagyawalkya Singh, Mr. Shubham Mishra and Ms. Akriti Singh, Advs. Mr. Mohd. Irshad, ASC (GNCTD) alongwith Ms. Nasreen, Mr. Kunal Raj and Mr. Shailesh Chauhan, Advs. for R-2 and R-3. Ms. Mrinalini Sen, SC (DDA) for DDA.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 19.02.2024
CM APPL. 4629/2024 (Exemption from filing of annexures)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application disposed of.
W.P.(C) 1102/2024
2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2024 at 14:46:41
SACHIN DATTA, J
liberty as prayed for.
FEBRUARY 19, 2024/r
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2024 at 14:46:41
SATINDER PAL SINGH
THE COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI
SACHIN DATTA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
