Writ petition against NHAI was withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to pursue appropriate steps in accordance with law; the court permitted withdrawal and made no observation on merits.
Permission to withdraw writ petition granted with liberty to take appropriate steps in accordance with law; no merits observations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar, Standing Counsel with Mr. Kushagra Aman and Mr. Adithya Ramni, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
% 19.02.2024 CM APPLs. 9511/2024, 9512/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 2282/2024 & CM APPL. 9513/2024
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
FEBRUARY 19, 2024 hsk
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/02/2024 at 12:56:55
Holtec Consulting Pvt Ltd
National Highways Authority of India
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
