Petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition following a settlement agreement with Respondents 2 and 3, stating the grievance stood redressed. The Court allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, cancelling the scheduled next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
SMT ASHA KAPOOR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Madan, Advocate. versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 16.10.2024
CM APPL. 60838/2024 (seeking withdrawal of the present petition)
W.P.(C) 2453/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/10/2024 at 15:13:53
SANJEEV NARULA, J
OCTOBER 16, 2024 /as
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/10/2024 at 15:13:53
SMT ASHA KAPOOR
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
