Disposal of a writ petition wherein the Court held that a subsequent Supreme Court judgment rendered the petition unsustainable, resulting in its disposal with no further orders.
The petition and pending applications were disposed of as nothing survived the Supreme Court judgment cited.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~70
PANKAJ KUMAR SRIVASTAV
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr.Rajnish Kr. Jha, Adv.
versus
UNION PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION & ANR
.....Respondents Through: Mr.Ravinder Agarwal & Mr.Lekh Raj Singh, Advs. for UPSC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R
% 16.10.2024 1. In view of the Judgment dated 08.07.2024 passed by the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 3303/2015 titled Union of India v. Pankaj Kumar Srivastava & Anr. , nothing survives in this petition. 2. The petition along with the pending applications is, accordingly, disposed of.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
OCTOBER 16, 2024 /rv/as
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:37:19
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Union of India v. Pankaj Kumar Srivastava & Anr., Civil Appeal No. 3303/2015Followed¶1
Pankaj Kumar Srivastav
Union Public Service Commission
Navin Chawla
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
