The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition as infructuous because the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner concluded with a finding of guilt, rendering the challenge to the order moot.
The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
C. CHANDRAKUMAR .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Shreenath A. Khemka, Adv.
versus
BORDER ROADS DEVELOPMENT BOARD AND ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Subhash Tanwar, CGSC with Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Mr. Naveen and Mr. Bhavi Garg, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR
O R D E R % 15.10.2024
In view of the subsequent developments, as the disciplinary proceedings against the petitioner have concluded, resulting in holding the petitioner guilty, which order is in challenge in W.P.(C) 11296/2023, the present petition has been rendered infructuous and is accordingly disposed of, leaving all contentions of the petitioner, including that of territorial jurisdiction, open to be adjudicated in the said petition.
NAVIN CHAWLA, J
SHALINDER KAUR, J
OCTOBER 15, 2024 /ss/km/SJ
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 08:56:33
C. Chandra Kumar
Border Roads Development Board and ors.
Navin Chawla
Shalinder Kaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
