Writ petition concerning a petitioner's service/retiral benefits; after her superannuation the respondent confirmed retiral benefit papers were sent for payment, and counsel agreed to dismissal. The petition was dismissed as infructuous with liberty to pursue any residual grievance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
Through: Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra, Mr. Yashwant S. Baghel and Mr. Rishabh Thakur, Advocates.
ANDHRA EDUCATION SOCIETY ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Hanu Bhaskar, CGSC with Ms. Savita Sethi, Advocate.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
FEBRUARY 8, 2024/ nd
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 14:41:07
Sailaja Remella
Andhra Education Society
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
