Writ petition against GNCTD and IHBAS; petitioner's counsel had recorded instructions to withdraw the petition, but no one appeared. The court dismissed the petition and pending application in default.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Standing Counsel for GNCTD (Services) with Mr. N.K. Singh, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates. Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing Counsel for R-2/ IHBAS with Mr. Manoviraj Singh and Mr. Sahaj Karan Singh, Advocates.
CORAM:
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
FEBRUARY 9, 2024 / nd
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/12/2024 at 15:12:48
Vinod Kumar Sharma
Govt. of NCT of Delhi
IHBAS
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
