Petitioner sought permission to withdraw his writ petition challenging a recruitment process; the court dismissed the petition as withdrawn along with the pending application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~R-211
Through: Mr. Anil Kumar, Advocate along with petitioner in person.
versus
CHAIRMAN RECURITMENT COMMITTEE OFFICE OF THE DISTRICT & SESSION JUDGE TIS HAZARI COURT & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R % 07.02.2024
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
FEBRUARY 7, 2024/ nd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/12/2024 at 15:35:03
Somdatt Sharma
Chairman Recruitment Committee, Office of the District & Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Courts
Ors.
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
