Disposed

Deepak & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC15 Feb 2024W.P.(C)/1668/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a Tribunal's order on promotion. The Court clarified that if the Tribunal concludes the promotion order breached a specific earlier Court order, it must ensure that employees up to serial no. 1000 are not disturbed.

What did the court decide?

Application stood disposed of; exemption allowed subject to conditions regarding employee serial numbers and compliance with a prior court order.

Deepak & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~30

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 1668/2024

¶4

DEEPAK & ORS. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Naagar, Mr. Piyush Aggarwal and Mr. Arun Kumar Nagar, Advocates.

¶5

versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ravi Prakash CGSC with Mr. Taha Yasin, Ms. Astu Khandelwal and Mr. Yasharth Shukla, Advocates for R-1 to 3.

¶6

Mr. Arun Bhardwaj, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Sriparna Chatterjee, Advocates for R -4 -18.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 15.02.2024

¶11

CM APPL. 6846/2024 (Ex)

¶12

Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶13

The application stands disposed of.

¶14

W.P.(C) 1668/2024 & CM APPL. 6845/2024 (Stay)

¶15

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks to assail the order dated 15.01.2024 passed by the learned Tribunal in C.P. No. 34/2024. Vide the impugned order, the learned Tribunal has come to a prima facie conclusion that the promotion order dated 12.01.2024, vide which the petitioner and some other similarly situated officers have been promoted was passed in

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:29:28

¶18

breach of this Court’s order dated 03.07.2023 in W. P. (C) 8420/2023. 4. Learned senior counsel for the respondent nos. 4 to 18, at whose behest the aforesaid contempt petition was filed, submits that these respondents are not aggrieved by the promotion order in so far as it pertains to the petitioners and other similarly placed officers in the seniority list up to serial no. 1000 as they are admittedly much senior to the respondents and belong to batches from 2011-13.

¶19

In the light of this stand taken by the respondent nos. 4 to 18, the grievance of the petitioners stands satisfied and, therefore, we dispose of the writ petition by clarifying that in the event, the learned Tribunal comes to a conclusion that the promotion order dated 12.01.2024 has been issued in breach of the Court’s order dated 03.07.2023, the Tribunal will ensure that the order in so far as it promotes employees up to serial no. 1000, is not disturbed.

¶20

It is, however, made clear that this order will not be construed as this Court having expressed any opinion regarding the effect of order dated 03.07.2023 passed in W.P. (C) 8420/2023.

¶21

REKHA PALLI, J

¶22

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J

¶23

FEBRUARY 15, 2024 p

¶24

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/12/2024 at 15:29:28

Deepak & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aditya Lal Vallath Vs National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences & Anr.

Ms Jeewan Lata Sud Vs Union of India & Anr.

Mitsubishi Electric India Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 16(1), Delhi & Ors.

Salim Kujur and Ors. Vs New-Delhi Muncipal Council and Anr.

Times Internet Limited Vs Pcit, DELHI-7 and Ors.

Shyam Prakash Vs Directorate of Vigilance & Anr.

Reebok India Company Vs Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Anr.

Gaurav Singh Vs Asstt. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle No 31(1) & Anr.

Dharmendra Goyal Vs Directorate of Education & Ors.

Mohammad Shakeel Vs Jamia Millia Islamia & Ors.

Sports Authority of India through Sh. Sandip Pradhan, Director General & Ors. Vs Dr. Hema Valecha

Virendra Kuamr and Ors. Vs the Union of India and Ors.

Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan (through Commissioner) & Ors. Vs Laxmi Narayan Gupta

Jyoti Vs Kendriya Vidayalaya Sangathan & Ors.