Petitioner sought withdrawal of a writ petition against a school; counsel withdrew it on instructions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AYESHA THROUGH HER NEXT FRIEND AND NATURAL FATHER SH. MOHAMMAD SHARIB AZEEM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Kumar Utkarsh, Adv. for Mr. Ashok Agarwal and Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advs.
versus
PRESENTATION CONVENT SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOL & ANR. ..... Respondents
..... Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh Singh, Advocate with Ms. Nikita Vir and Ms. Prashansha Sharma, Advs. for Mr.Santosh Kumar Tripathi, Standing Counsel (Civil) GNCTD for DoE.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R % 05.02.2024
1. Mr. Kumar Utkarsh, learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks, on instructions, to withdraw this writ petition.
2. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
FEBRUARY 5, 2024 dsn
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 01:38:09
Ayesha through her next friend and natural father Sh. Mohammad Sharib Azeem
Presentation Convent Senior Secondary School
Respondent 2 (Anr.)
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
