Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as the petitioner was absent on the date of hearing and also on the previous date when the matter was called out twice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
JAVED IQBAL ..... Petitioner Through: None
versus
THE PRINCIPAL APEEJAY SCHOOL AND ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Kamal Gupta, Ms. Tripti Gupta, Mr. Sparsh Aggarwal, Mr. Karan Chaudhary and Ms. Yosha Dutt, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
%
O R D E R 16.05.2024
1. There is no appearance on behalf of the petitioner. On the last date of hearing also, although the matter was called out twice, the petitioner was absent.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
MAY 16, 2024/ yg
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/05/2024 at 11:45:29
Javed Iqbal
The Principal Apeejay School
Apeejay School
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
