Petitioner sought to withdraw its writ petition; the Delhi High Court disposed of the petition as withdrawn. No substantive adjudication on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
M/S JINDAL SAW LIMITED .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Anurag Abhishek and Ms. Saima Mahmood, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents
Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Ms. Pinky Pawar and Mr. Aakash Pathak, Advocates for UOI. Mr. Abhishek Gupta and Mr. Vaibhav Dayma, Advocates for R-3 & 4. Mr. Rajesh Banati, Mr. Ashish Sareen, Mr. Adil Asghar, Mr. Harsh Gupta, Ms. Shriya Sharma and Mr. Ankit Banati, Advocates for R-8.
CORAM:
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R
%
14.08.2024
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
AUGUST 14, 2024/ Aj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2024 at 14:27:32
M/S Jindal Saw Limited
Union of India
Acting Chief Justice
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
