Petitioner withdrew writ petition with liberty to seek appropriate remedy; Court allowed withdrawal and disposed of application.
Writ petition disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to take recourse to appropriate remedies before the appropriate Forum. Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~94
SHALESH CHANDRA .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Mrinalini Khatri and Ms. Upma Shrivastava, Advocates.
versus
DELHI AIRPORT PARKING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Digvijay Rai and Mr. Archit Mishra, Advocates for Respondent No.3/AAI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
% 13.11.2024
CM APPL. 66168/2024
W.P.(C) 15774/2024
JYOTI SINGH, J
NOVEMBER 13, 2024
B.S. Rohella
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 02:23:31
Shalesh Chandra
Delhi Airport Parking Services Private Limited
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
