Writ petition regarding cancellation and rescheduling of an examination. Petitioner sought withdrawal as subsequent orders rendered the matter infructuous.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1
DR. MOHAMMAD NAZIM ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Mujahid Ahmad, Advocate.
versus
THE UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Ms. Archana Sharma, SPC for UOI with Mr. Gokul Sharma, GP for R-1 and R-2.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 10.01.2024
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:25:12
become infructuous.
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JANUARY 10, 2024/ nd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/05/2024 at 12:25:12
DR. MOHAMMAD NAZIM
THE UNION OF INDIA
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
