The court directed the respondents to positively conduct the DPC regarding the petitioner's promotion within two weeks and ensure consequential benefits are released as per law.
Direction to conduct DPC within two weeks and release consequential benefits according to the outcome.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
SMT SANTOSH SETHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nishant S. Diwan, Advocate
Versus
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Latika Chaudhary, Advocate for R-1&2
Mr. Karan Sharma, Advocate for R- 3&4
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R
% 09.01.2024
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 15:19:56
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
JANUARY 9, 2024/ ms
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/05/2024 at 15:19:56
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's Departmental Promotion Committee (DPC) should be conducted forthwith?
Smt Santosh Sethi
Department of Education
Ors.
Tushar Rao Greda
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
