Disposed

Smriti Tiwari v. Union of India and Anr.

Delhi HC14 Aug 2024W.P.(C)/14528/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a service matter writ petition regarding termination and maternity benefits by transferring it to the Central Administrative Tribunal, citing Section 14 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, noting that the Tribunal is the appropriate first instance forum.

What did the court decide?

Transfer of the writ petition to the Central Administrative Tribunal for appropriate orders and further proceedings.

Smriti Tiwari Vs Union of India and Anr. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~71

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 14528/2022, CM APPLs. 44424/2022 and 24109/2023

¶4

SMRITI TIWARI .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Ms. Kawalpreet Kaur and Mr. Umesh Kumar, Advocates

¶6

versus

¶7

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mrs. Amrita Prakash, CGSC with Mr. Vishal Ashwani Mehta and Mr. Hansraj Bhardwaj, Advocates for R-1.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

¶10

O R D E R % 14.08.2024

¶11

This writ petition has been preferred on behalf of the Petitioner seeking the following reliefs:

¶12

“1. Direct the Respondent hospital to reinstate the Petitioner with all statutory benefits and to not terminate the services of the Petitioner.

¶13

2. Direct the Respondent no. 1 and 2 to comply and implement Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017 at respondent premises.

¶14

3. Direct respondent to provide crèche facilities at respondent hospital in compliance with Maternity Benefit (Amendment) Act, 2017 which directs every establishment having fifty or more employees to have the facility of crèche within a prescribed distance.

¶15

4. Direct the Respondent hospital to quash the letter dated 28.04.2022 terminating the services of Petitioner w.e.f. 20.09.2021 despite Petitioner having worked in the respondent hospital till 21.02.2022 after which she availed maternity leave.

¶16

5. Direct the Respondent hospital to pay the Petitioner with full back wages since 01.10.2021 until 21.02.2022 and to provide her paid maternity leave for 180 days following her leave.

¶17

6. Direct the Respondent no. 1 and 2 to immediately halt victimising and terminating women employed as contractual employees in respondent hospital availing maternity benefits.”

¶18

W.P.(C) 14528/2022 Page 1 of 2

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 17/08/2024 at 14:29:14

¶20

From a reading of the writ petition, it is apparent that the reliefs claimed are in the realm of service matter disputes and the Respondents against whom the reliefs are claimed are Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital and therefore the remedy of the Petitioner lies before the Central Administrative Tribunal, as Court of first instance, by virtue of Section 14 of The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and judgment of the Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court in L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India and Others, (1997) 3 SCC 261 .

¶21

Ordinarily, this Court would have permitted the Petitioner to withdraw this petition to take recourse to appropriate remedy, however, considering that the writ petition was filed in the year 2022 and there are interim orders in favour of the Petitioner, this Court deems it appropriate under these facts and circumstances to dispose of this petition by transferring this petition before the Central Administrative Tribunal. Petition shall be listed before the learned Chairman on 03.09.2024 for appropriate orders and further proceedings.

¶22

Registry is directed to transmit the entire record of the writ petition to the Tribunal before the next date.

¶23

Petition stands disposed of in the aforesaid terms along with the pending applications, making it clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case.

¶24

JYOTI SINGH, J

¶25

AUGUST 14, 2024/kks

¶26

W.P.(C) 14528/2022

¶27

Page 2 of 2

¶28

Smriti Tiwari v. Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smriti Tiwari v. Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Malvinder Kuar Vs Director of Director of Education & Ors.

Jeet Kumar & Ors. Vs Bses Rajdhani Power Limited

Smt. Anuradha Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.

Md. Rajak Khan Vs Union of India & Ors.

Leena Hopper Vs St Anthony'S Girls Primary School and Ors.

Surender Kumar Sharma Vs Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Naveen Arora Vs North Delhi Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Finolex Cables Limited Vs Telecommunication Consultants of India Limited & Anr.

Malvinder Kuar Vs Director of Director of Education & Ors.

Satyender Kaushik Vs Union of India & Ors.

Pushpendra Vs Union of India & Ors.

Vinod Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Great Bear Aviation Pvt. Ltd. Vs Department of Forest Wildlife Gnct of Delhi and Ors.

Jai Parkash Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Others