Petitioner sought to withdraw his writ petition concerning lawyers chambers allotment; senior counsel stated the petition would be withdrawn and the court dismissed it as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~57
DHARMENDRA SINGH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Senior Advocate with Mr. Amit Choudhary, Mr. Aman Dhyani, Ms. Kanchan Semwal, Advocates
versus
LAWYERS CHAMBERS ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Satyakam, Mr. Faizeen Hussain Khan, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R
% 06.12.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
DECEMBER 6, 2024/ab
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:48:10
Dharmendra Singh
Lawyers Chambers Allotment Committee
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
