Petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive legal principles were laid down in this order.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~56
MENKA RANA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. R. S. Kundu, Advocate.
versus
THE CHAIRMAN, LAWYERS CHAMBERS ALLOTMENT COMMITTEE SAKET DISTRICT COURTS, ND AND ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Satyakam, Mr. Faizeen Hussain Khan, Advocates
Ms. Beenashaw Nanda Soni, SPC with Ms. Ann Joseph, Advocate for R-3
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 06.12.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
DECEMBER 6, 2024/ab
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:46:30
Menska Rana
Chairman, Lawyers Chambers Allotment Committee Saket District Courts
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
