Writ petition withdrawn at the request of the petitioner's counsel; the Delhi High Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without deciding any substantive issue.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~59
SRIDHAR LAGADAPATI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ankit Tripathi, Mr. Gaurav Jain, Ms. Kareena Sharma, Mr. Atul Malhotra and Mr. Manan Popli, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Santosh Kumar Rout SC with Ms. Dhama Veragi, Advocate for R-3.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 05.12.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
DECEMBER 5, 2024 sapna
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:46:23
Sridhar Lagadapati
Union of India
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
