Petitioner sought release of an impounded vehicle under the Guidelines for Handling of End of Life Vehicles in Public Places of Delhi, 2024. Respondents undertook to process any such application expeditiously in accordance with law, and the writ petition was disposed of without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
ARUN MAITRI .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Radhika Chander Shekhar, Mr. Arnav Mudgal, Advocates.
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS.
.....Respondents
Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate for MCD. Mr. Dhruv Gautam, Mr. Tushar Tyagi, Advocates for R-3.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 04.12.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:48:26
PRATEEK JALAN, J
DECEMBER 4, 2024 “Bhupi” / AL/
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/12/2024 at 11:48:26
Arun Maitri
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
