Writ petition withdrawn after respondents raised a territorial jurisdiction objection. Petitioner sought liberty to approach the court having territorial jurisdiction; petition disposed of as not pressed with no opinion expressed on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
Through: Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Gaurav Sharma, SPC with Mr. Sidhartha Nagpal, Mr. Anant A. Pavgi, Mr. Sachin Singh, Ms. Seema Singh and Ms. Ishita, Advs. for R- 1/UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 13.09.2024
REKHA PALLI, J
SACHIN DATTA, J
SEPTEMBER 13, 2024 SU
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 19/09/2024 at 12:10:04
Sanjay Kumar
Union of India & Ors.
Rekha Palli
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
