Disposed

Ram Kishan v. the State, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC11 Sept 2024W.P.(C)/12713/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Senior citizen sought enforcement of prior High Court and District Magistrate eviction orders after trespassers obstructed possession of part of his property. The court recorded counsel's assurance of compliance and directed respondents to ensure compliance within two weeks, disposing of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondents to ensure compliance with the District Magistrate's orders and deliver vacant possession within two weeks; petition disposed of.

Ram Kishan Vs the State, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr. — Property and Title | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~70

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 12713/2024 & CM APPL. 53021/2024

¶4

RAM KISHAN

¶5

.....Petitioner

¶6

Through: Mr. Ashish Mohan, Mr. Sultan Chaudhary, Mr. Krishna Roy, Mr. Satyapal, Mr. Pravesh, Mr. Sachin Choudhary, Advocates.

¶7

versus

¶8

THE STATE, GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI & ANR.

¶9

.....Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Sharma, Senior Panel Counsel for R-2. S.I. Prashant Malik, P.S. Mayur Vihar

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA

¶11

¶12

O R D E R 11.09.2024

¶13

Petitioner’s grievance arises from non-compliance of order dated 02^nd July, 2024 in writ petition bearing No. W.P.(C) 8867/2024 as well as order dated 28^th May, 2024 passed by District Magistrate (East) for eviction of the Petitioner’s daughter-in-law, Mrs. Radha, widow of late Mr. Satish Kumar and Petitioner’s grandsons Mr. Abhishek and Mr. Ansh.

¶14

Mr. Ashish Mohan, counsel for the Petitioner, submits that pursuant to the afore-noted orders, Petitioner secured possession of two properties admeasuring 500 square yards and 50 square yards situated at Khasra No. 332/80, however, the third property identified as 150 square yards, which is located in the same Khasra No. 332/80, is in occupation of some trespassers.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:25:47

¶16

He further submits that the District Magistrate through order dated 26^th July, 2024 directed the SHO (P.S. Mayur Vihar) to depute a beat constable to ensure strict compliance of the orders passed by it. Hence, the Petitioner seeks a direction to the Respondent to execute the order passed by the District Magistrate and to ensure that the vacant possession of the properties be delivered to the Petitioners with no further interference of trespassers.

¶17

It is noted that through order dated 26^th July, 2024, the District Magistrate noted that hindrance caused by trespassers is interfering with the peaceful possession of the properties of the Petitioner. The said order reads to the following effect:

¶18

“3. In view of the aforesaid, and after perusal of the said application, including the photographs attached with the application, it appears that the peaceful possession of the Applicant/Senior Citizen qua the property in question is being disturbed repeatedly despite orders passed by this Tribunal, the Appellate Tribunal as well as the orders of the Hon’ble Delhi High Court. This Tribunal is of the considered view that the peaceful possession of the Senior Citizen qua the subject property should not be disturbed by any party, including the Respondents. It appears that the Respondents, in order to circumvent the orders of this Tribunal. Have installed proxy trespassers in the subject properties, thereby causing further harassment to the Applicant/Senior Citizen, and violating the orders issued by this Tribunal.

¶19

4. In view thereof, the SHO (P.S. Mayur Vihar) is directed that the order of eviction be complied with immediately; and the Respondents, or any other illegal trespasser found within the subject properties be evicted from the subject property, and the complete vacant possession of the same be handed over to the Applicant, or any person authorized by the Applicant so that the Applicant may enjoy his property without any further harassment and hinderance by the Respondent or any trespassers. The aforesaid be complied within a period of 48 hours, from the date of receipt of this order and a compliance report be filed in respect to the same within 7 days. It is further directed that in case any person found obstructing or violating the implementation the orders of this Tribunal, strict action may be taken against such persons as per law.”

¶20

This is a digitally signed order.

¶21

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:25:47

¶22

In the above background, counsel for the Respondent No. 2 assures that the orders of this Court and those passed by the District Magistrate shall be positively complied with.

¶23

Having regard to the afore-noted circumstances and the previous orders of this Court and the District Magistrate, Respondents are directed to ensure compliance within a period of two weeks from today.

¶24

The present petition along with pending applications, if any, is disposed of.

¶25

SANJEEV NARULA, J

¶26

SEPTEMBER 11, 2024/ab

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:25:47

Ram Kishan v. the State, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ram Kishan v. the State, Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suyasha Sharma Vs National Board of Examinations in Medical Sciences & Ors.

DDA Vs Vaibhav Malik & Ors.

Kamal Kumar and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Gurudwara Shree Guru Singh Sabha through Its President Sh. G. S. Chhatwal Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

Omkar Gupta Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others

Dinmani Sharma Vs Principal District and Sessions Judge & Ors.

Harsh Patuna & Ors. Vs National Capital Territory of Delhi & Anr.

Dr. Saiqa Ikram Vs Jamia Millia Islamia and Ors.

Sunny Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sh. Iqbal Singh & Ors. Vs the Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ajay Kumar Gupta Vs Union of India through Ministry of Home Affairs & Ors.

M/S Rakesh Gupta Jv and Glazetech Industries Private Limited Vs National Highways Logistics Management Limited & Anr.

Amit Fabricator and Hydraulic Industries through Its Sole Proprietor Mr. Amit Kumar Vs Airports Authority of India & Ors.

Irshad Khan Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.