The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition filed to enforce a CIC order. Finding the CIC had already issued a show cause notice, the Court held the petition premature and directed the CIC to expedite disposal.
Writ petition disposed of to avoid conflict with CIC proceedings; directed CIC to expeditiously dispose of pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~74
Through: Appearance not given.
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mohd. Irsad, ASC with Ms. Nasreen and Mr. Kunal Raj, Advocates for R- 1. Mr. Rahul Sharma, SPC with Mr. Himanshu Gautam, Mr. Saurabh Sharma, Mr. Ayush Bhatt and Mr. Harsh Rao, Advocates for R-2. SI. Arvind, GTB Enclave.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
%
O R D E R 11.09.2024
1 “PIO”
2 “the Hospital”
3 “RTI Act”
Page 1 of 4
W.P.(C) 12773/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:22:01
was not provided. Consequently, an appeal was filed to the First Appellate Authority and thereafter, a second appeal bearing No. CIC/EMCDN/A/2021/150799UM was preferred to the Central Information Commission.4 Through order dated 18th October, 2022, CIC directed the Central Public Information Officer of the Hospital to furnish information to the Petitioner herein, within a period of 30 days.
“1. Learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to approach the Central Information Commission (CIC) regarding compliance of the Order dated 18.10.2022 passed by the Central Information Commission (CIC).
2. Permission and liberty, as sought for, are granted.
3. It is open for the Respondents to comply with the Order dated 18.10.2022 before the Petitioner approaches the Central Information Commission (CIC).
4. The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn, along with pending application(s), if any.”
4 “CIC”
Page 2 of 4
W.P.(C) 12773/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:22:01
CIC to take action to ensure compliance of an Order dated 18.10.2022 passed by the CIC in the instant matter.
2. This Court vide Order dated 08.02.2024 had disposed of the writ petition by permitting the Petitioner to approach the CIC for effective implementation of the order.
3. Material on record discloses that pursuant to this order, the Petitioner has moved an application under Section 18 read with Section 20 of the RTI Act on 07.03.2024.
4. This writ petition is being disposed of with a request to the CIC to dispose of the application filed by the Petitioner under the RTI Act in accordance with law.
5. The writ petition is disposed of along with pending application(s), if any.”
“7. The Commission after adverting to the facts and circumstances of the case, hearing the appellant and perusal of the records, noted that the respondent remained absent despite service of hearing notice. The appellant submitted that the respondent has neither provided any document sought under the RTI Act nor furnished a copy of enquiry report as directed by the Commission till the date of hearing. The documents on records show that the direction of the Commission is not complied with by the respondents in toto and due to their absence, response for non-compliance of the above order could not be ascertained.
It is pertinent to mention that more than two and half year has elapsed, the information sought has not been provided to the appellant. Besides, as per the records, no enquiry is conducted by the concerned FAA as directed by the Commission vide order dated 18.10.2024. Thus, actions of the PIO/FAA prima facie appear to be casual, insensitive and not as per the provisions of the RTI Act.
In view of the above lapses, Dr. Puneeta Kunjur, present PIO, the then PIO (as on 18.10.2024) and the then FAA (as on 18.10.2022) as deemed PIO are show caused to explain as to why maximum penalty under Section 20(1) of the RTI
5 Order with respect to disposal of non-compliance dated 01st August, 2024
Page 3 of 4
W.P.(C) 12773/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:22:01
Act should not be imposed upon each of them for non-compliance of the Commission's order and not furnishing the information to the appellant. The present PIO, Dr. Puneeta Kunjur, is given responsibility to serve a copy of this order as well as the show-cause notices to the then PIO (as on 18.10.2024) and the then FAA (18.10.2022) secure their written explanations as well as their attendance on the next date of hearing. All the written explanations (from the PIOs and the then FAA) must reach the Commission within three weeks from the date of receipt of this order.
Further, the PIO is directed to comply with the aforesaid order dated 18.10.2022 of the Commission, without further delay and documents are provided to the appellant free of cost within three weeks' time from the date of receipt of this order.”
SANJEEV NARULA, J
SEPTEMBER 11, 2024
as
Page 4 of 4
W.P.(C) 12773/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 12/09/2024 at 12:22:01
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the present writ petition is maintainable given that the CIC has already issued a show cause notice regarding non-compliance of its earlier order.
How the Court should dispose of the petition considering the CIC's pending inquiry into the PIO's inaction.
Irshad Khan
Govt of NCT of Delhi
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
