Application for extension of time to join PG course dismissed because the underlying writ petition seeking study leave had already been dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~128
DR. CHAYAN JAIN
.....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sagar Saxena, Mr. Parmeet Singh, Mr. Sarthak Pandey, Advocates
versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
% 20.12.2024
CM APPL. 75168/2024
JYOTI SINGH, J
DECEMBER 20, 2024/j
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/12/2024 at 11:59:57
Dr. Chayan Jain
Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
