The High Court allowed an application for exemption and disposed of it. The petitioner subsequently withdrew the writ petition with liberty to seek review from the Tribunal, and the court dismissed the petition accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the petition with liberty to file review before the Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~63
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Akshay Amritanshu, Senior Panel Counsel with Mr. Samyak Jain, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R
% 04.09.2024 CM APPL. 51359/2024
W.P.(C) 12348/2024
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
SEPTEMBER 4, 2024/as
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 10/09/2024 at 12:16:29
SHRI PRAMOD SHARMA
UNION OF INDIA
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
GIRISH KATHPALIA
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
