Orders were passed allowing a cram application to correct the record of appearance for counsel for the respondents, clarifying that appearance was entered on a previous date.
Application allowed to correct record of appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ranvir Singh, SPC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN O R D E R % 27.09.2024
CM APPL. 57186/2024
1. Mr. Ranvir Singh submits that he had appeared on behalf of all the respondents on 3 September 2024, but that his appearance is not marked.
2. Believing the submission of learned Counsel, though the matter was not before this Court, we agree to enter the appearance of Mr. Ranvir Singh as Counsel for the respondents in the order dated 3 September 2024.
3. The application stands allowed in the aforesaid term.
C. HARI SHANKAR, J.
DR. SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J. SEPTEMBER 27, 2024/ dsn Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/10/2024 at 12:31:57
Raj Kumar (Ex Tadk)
Union of India & Ors.
C. Hari Shankar
Sudhir Kumar Jain
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
