Appeal against dismissal of writ petition concerning ONGC orders; Delhi office had passed no order, so the court held it lacked jurisdiction, dismissed the appeal, and granted liberty to approach the appropriate forum.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
NAMAN SHARMA .....Appellant
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vineet Dhanda, CGSC with Mr. Abhishrut Singh and Mr. Kartik K. Sood, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Abhishek Gupta and Mr. Vaibhav, Advocate for R2 to 5
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA
O R D E R
% 02.09.2024
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
SEPTEMBER 2, 2024/as
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/09/2024 at 15:32:41
Naman Sharma
Union of India
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 3
Respondent No. 4
Respondent No. 5
Suresh Kumar Kait
Girish Kathpalia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
