Writ petition concerning a workplace matter; counsel for the petitioner sought withdrawal citing positive developments and prospects of amicable settlement. The petition, along with the pending application, was dismissed as withdrawn with no objection from respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~14
RATNESH KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Girdhar Govind and Ms. Alam Noor, Advocates
versus
EDCIL INDIA LTD & ORS ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Bhagvan Swarup Shukla, CGSC and Ms. Sumita Shukla Advocate for UOI
Ms. Aashnaa Bhatia and Mr. Saurabh Mishra, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA O R D E R % 05.04.2024
(The proceeding has been conducted through Hybrid Mode)
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
APRIL 5, 2024/ ms
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2024 at 12:07:14
Ratnesh Kumar
EDCIL India Ltd
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
