Writ petition sought directions for a time-bound hearing of a Misc. Appeal pending before the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. As the appeal was already listed for hearing, the Court disposed of the petition directing that the matter be taken up on the listed date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
BANK OF BARODA .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Mahaliyan, Advocate
versus
SANGEETA GROVER & ANR .....Respondents Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 08.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:50:28
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
AUGUST 8, 2024 Aj
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:50:28
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking a time-bound hearing of the pending DRAT Misc. Appeal should be allowed.
Bank of Baroda
Sangeeta Grover
Acting Chief Justice
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
