Petitioner sought withdrawal of its writ petition with liberty to make a representation to the State Delhi Animal Welfare Board. The court permitted withdrawal, disposed of the petition, directed that the representation be decided expeditiously in accordance with law, and left all rights and contentions open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
CORAM: HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELA
O R D E R % 07.08.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:45:37
expeditiously as possible. The rights and contentions of all the parties are left open.
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J
AUGUST 7, 2024 Aj
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 13/08/2024 at 11:45:37
1 issue framed by the court
Should the writ petition be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file a representation before the State Delhi Animal Welfare Board?
Pet Lovers Association (Regd)
Union of India
Tushar Rao Gedela
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
