The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition as premature, noting that the statutory time period for processing returns for Assessment Year 2022-23 had not expired.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~118
RAHUL .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Yogesh Kumar, Advocate.
versus
THE COMMISSIONER OF
INCOME TAX & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjeev Menon, JSC.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA
O R D E R
% 06.08.2024
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
AUGUST 6, 2024/ vp
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/08/2024 at 11:35:44
Rahul
The Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
Yashwant Varma
Ravinder Dudeja
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
