Partly allowed

Union of India. & Ors. v. IC-4800Y Maj Sunit Mehrotra

Delhi HC5 Aug 2024W.P.(C)/10627/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging an Armed Forces Tribunal order that restored an Army officer's seniority and promotion to Major General. Both parties agreed to set aside the Tribunal's directions and remand the matter to the Selection Board for fresh consideration of the seniority claim. The Court set aside the directions and remanded the case, clarifying the responden

What did the court decide?

Impugned Tribunal order setting aside seniority restoration and promoting respondent as Maj Gen is set aside; matter remanded to Selection Board for fresh consideration of seniority claim; respondent

Union of India. & Ors. Vs IC-4800Y Maj Sunit… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~50

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 10627/2024

¶4

UNION OF INDIA. & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Farman Ali, SPC with Mr. Taha Yasin, Ms. Usha Jamnal, Advs. Col. Sarika MS Legal Maj. Anish Muralidhar (Army).

¶5

versus

¶6

IC-4800Y MAJ GEN SUNIT MEHROTRA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 05.08.2024

¶11

CAV 349/2024

¶12

Since learned counsel for the caveator/respondent has entered appearance, the caveat stands discharged. CM APPL. 43705/2024 –Ex.

¶13

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

¶14

Application stands disposed of.

¶15

W.P.(C) 10627/2024 & CM APPL. 43704/2024-Stay

¶16

At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners points out that due to an inadvertent typographical error, the memo of parties wrongly reflects the rank of the respondent as a Major whereas in fact he is a Major General. He, therefore, prays that cause title of the present petition be suitably corrected.

¶17

At the oral request of learned counsel for the petitioners, the cause title of the present petition stands corrected to “ UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 07:54:54

¶20

vs. IC-4800Y MAJ GEN SUNIT MEHROTRA ” and the corrected cause title be incorporated in the present order as well.

¶21

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeks to assail the order dated 03.07.2024 passed by the learned Armed Forces Tribunal in O.A. No.748/2023 vide which the OA has been allowed by the learned Tribunal with the following directions:

¶22

(a) The results of the applicant in No I SB held in 201 9 are set aside.

¶23

(b) The applicant shall be restored to his original seniority of 1988 Batch.

¶24

(c) The applicant shall be deemed to be promoted as per his original seniority to the rank, of Maj Gen and be granted all consequential benefits for promotion, pay and allowances and pension.

¶25

(d) These orders shall take effect within one month from the date of issue of such order.

¶26

Learned counsel for the respondent, who appears on advance notice, at the outset submits that taking into account that it is the petitioners’ plea that the learned Tribunal could not have itself restored the original seniority of 1988 Batch of the petitioner as a Major General and have urged that the matter ought to have been remanded to the Selection Board, the respondent is agreeable for setting aside of the directions issued by the Tribunal and the matter being remanded back to No.1 Selection Board for reconsideration of his case for restoration of his seniority.

¶27

After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that taking into account the peculiar facts of the present case and the urgency to hold a Selection Board due to the forthcoming vacancy of Lieutenant General, Corps of Signals, the petitioners would be satisfied in case this Court were to set aside the directions issued by learned

¶28

This is a digitally signed order.

¶29

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 07:54:54

¶30

Tribunal for restoration of the petitioner’s seniority and were to instead remand the matter back to No.1 Selection Board for reconsideration of the respondent’s case for restoration of his seniority in the light of the observations made in the impugned order.

¶31

In the light of the aforesaid stand taken by the parties, we are of the view that in the peculiar facts of the present case, when both parties are ad idem that the matter can be resolved by setting aside the directions issued in the impugned order and the matter being instead remanded to the Selection Board for reconsidering the respondent’s case for restoration of his seniority, no useful purpose will be served in examining the legality of the directions issued under the impugned order.

¶32

We, accordingly, dispose of the writ petition by setting aside the directions issued by the learned Tribunal with a direction that the respondent’s case for promotion to the rank of Major General as a fresh case of 1988 batch of Corps of Signals be reconsidered by the Selection Board by taking into account the observations made by the learned Tribunal.

¶33

We, however, make it clear that in case the Selection Board finds merit in the respondent’s claim and decides to restore the respondent’s seniority as a Major General, the respondent will not be entitled to claim any arrears of wages.

¶34

The writ petition along with the accompanying application is disposed of in the aforesaid terms.

¶35

REKHA PALLI, J

¶36

SHALINDER KAUR, J

¶37

AUGUST 5, 2024/ab

¶38

This is a digitally signed order.

¶39

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 07:54:54

Union of India. & Ors. v. IC-4800Y Maj Sunit Mehrotra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Union of India. & Ors. v. IC-4800Y Maj Sunit Mehrotra

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fairfield Institute of Management and Technology Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Yogesh Sethi Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Others & Ors.

Adroit Financial Services Private Limited Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 1(1),DELHI & Ors.

Avni Nath Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 54(1), Delhi

Surinder Kumar Vs Tpddl and Anr.

Dr. Subhash Vijayran Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Guru Harkishan Public School & Anr. Vs Ravinder Singh Sachdev & Anr.

M/S Deutsche Lufthansa Ag Vs Mr. Nayan Pahwa & Ors.

Daya Kishan Vs Union of India & Ors.

Manoj Dhyani Vs Union of India and Others

Kamal Bhasin Vs Ghanshyam Kumar

Sheo Niwaj & Ors. Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ct/Pnr Rect Mahabir Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.

Shri M. S. Yadav Vs Union of India & Ors.