Disposed

Daya Kishan v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC2 Aug 2024W.P.(C)/3672/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of the petition. Noting that a Review Medical Board had examined the petitioner and attributed disabilities to service, the Court directed respondents to submit those proceedings and decide a representation for prosthetic limb sanction or compassionate appointment within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to submit Review Medical Board proceedings and decide the petitioner's representation relief within eight weeks by passing a reasoned order.

Daya Kishan Vs Union of India & Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~3

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(C) 3672/2024 & CM APPL. 15146/2024 –Stay DAYA KISHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Vivek Sheel, Ms.Deepshika & Mr.Anshul Mahayan, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Jagdish Chandra & Mr.Prakhar Srivastava, Advs.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR

¶8

O R D E R % 02.08.2024

¶9

The petitioner, who is serving as a Constable (General Duty) in the Indo Tibetan Border Police Force (ITBP), has approached this Court seeking the following reliefs:-

¶10

“(i) This Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned Medical Board proceedings dated 09.12.2023 (Annexure-P-1); and (ii) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash and set aside the impugned notice No: ITBP/50BN/ESTT2/MEDICAL BOARD OUT/2024-456 dated 02.02.2024 issued by Respondent No. 4 (Annexure-P-2); and /or; (iii) That this Hon’ble Court may kindly declare that the disability sustained by the Petitioner as attributable to Govt. service in view of the findings of Court of Inquiry dated 13.04.1998 or, in alternative, issue appropriate Writ to Respondents No. 2-5 to convene a Review Medical Board to examine the Petitioner afresh; and (iv) Further direct the Respondent No. 2 to pass a speaking order on the representation dated 18.02.2024 preferred by the Petitioner seeking reliefs of release of sanction of prosthetic limb or equivalent grantin- aid and further compassionate appointment for family member of

¶11

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/07/2025 at 10:09:20

¶12

the Petitioner; and/or

¶13

(v) Pass such other or further order or orders as this Hon’ble Court may feel deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”

¶14

On the last date, taking into account the petitioner’s grievance that he was, despite his repeated requests, not being examined by a Review Medical Board, the learned counsel for the respondents was granted time to obtain instructions.

¶15

Today, he submits that the petitioner already stands examined by a Review Medical Board on 13.04.2024, wherein it has been found that the disabilities from which he is suffering are attributable to service. He further submits that further action based on these recommendations of the Review Medical Board will be taken shortly.

¶16

In the light of the aforesaid stand taken by the respondents, we dispose of the petition by directing the respondents to provide a copy of the Review Medical Board proceedings held on 13.04.2024 to the learned counsel for the petitioner and decide his representation dated 18.02.2024 within a period of eight weeks by passing a reasoned and speaking order.

¶17

Needless to state in case, the petitioner is aggrieved by any order passed by the respondents, it will be open for him to seek legal recourse as permissible in law.

¶18

REKHA PALLI, J

¶19

SHALINDER KAUR, J

¶20

AUGUST 2, 2024 kk

¶21

Daya Kishan v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Daya Kishan v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Paper Mate Pvt. Ltd. Vs Municipal Corporation Delhi & Ors.

Misha Textiles Private Limited (through Director) Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 17(1) Delhi & Ors.

Smt. Savita Vs Bses Rajdhani Power Limited

Avinder Bindra Vs Government of NCT of Delhi

Fairfield Institute of Management and Technology Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Shri Bhagwan Sahay Vs Govt of NCT of Delhi and Others

Smt. Renu Bisht Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Rajiv Vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Anr.

Kalpana Kumari through Sita Ram Vs Union of India & Ors.

Ajay Kishor Vs Union of India and Ors.

Pradeep Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors.

Manoj Dhyani Vs Union of India and Others

Kamal Bhasin Vs Ghanshyam Kumar

Vivek Kumar Vs Union of India and Ors.