Two appeals against orders rejecting applications to amend witness lists and file fresh amendment applications were disposed of after the appellant informed the court he no longer wished to press them.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2 & 3
versus
RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms.Smita Maan, Mr. Vishal Maan and Mr. Satyawan Rathee, Advocates
Through: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Ms. Tejaswi Shetty, Ms. Harshika Reddy and Ms. Drishti Harpalani, Advocates
versus
RAJESH KUMAR GUPTA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Senior Advocate with Ms.Smita Maan, Mr. Vishal Maan and Mr. Satyawan Rathee, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON
O R D E R % 08.01.2020
Page 1 of 2
appellant/defendant under Order XVI Rule 1(3) of the CPC, praying inter alia for permission to amend the list of witnesses (I.A.5068/2019). FAO(OS) 214/2019 is directed against an order dated 27.09.2019, passed by the learned Single Judge dismissing I.A.13579/2019, yet again filed by the appellant/defendant under Order XVI Rule 1A of the CPC.
HIMA KOHLI, J
ASHA MENON, J
JANUARY 08, 2020 s
Page 2 of 2
FAOs(OS) 210/2019 & 214/2019
Pratap Dube
Rajesh Kumar Gupta
Hima Kohli
Asha Menon
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
