THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +…
Delay condoned and one appeal allowed subject to exceptions; another appeal dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
| NAVEEN GOEL | Through |
..... Appellant Mr. Ateer Mathur, Ms. Neha Bhatia and Mr. Amal Sharma, Advocates |
|---|---|---|
| versus | ||
| STATE & ORS | ..... Respondents | |
| Through | Ms. Shefali Vohra, Advocate for R-1 | |
| Mr. Mukul Bawa, Advocate for R-3 |
| CORAM: |
|---|
| JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR |
| JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH |
| O R D E R |
| % 20.12.2019 |
CM APPL. 54659/2019 (exemption)
CM APPL. 54658/2019 (delay)
FAO(OS) 255/2019 & CM APPL. 54660/2019
S.MURALIDHAR, J
TALWANT SINGH, J
DECEMBER 20, 2019
rr
NAVEEN GOEL
STATE
S.MURALIDHAR
TALWANT SINGH
As recorded by the court registry
An appeal to a Division Bench against an order made by a single judge on the original side of the High Court.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
